Post image for i (heart) brooklyn

i (heart) brooklyn

by Meghan on July 23, 2010

BOOK REPORT for a tree grows in brooklyn by betty smith

bff charm: yay
swoonworthy scale: 7
talky talk: straight up
bonus factors: feminism, history, brooklyn
relationship status: LYLAS

atreeinbrooklyn

the deal:

francie lives with her parents and younger brother in a tenement in early-20th-century brooklyn. her mom’s the tough, hardworking daughter of german immigrants, and her father’s the easygoing, charming alcoholic son of irish immigrants. francie — not pretty, but bookish and as hardworking as her mother — grows up and finds her own way in the changing world around her. this book’s a classic coming of age novel, and one i never read as a teenager, but i’m glad i finally got around to it!

bff charm: yay

bff

i had to admire francie — the girl reads a book a day! the book never says whether they’re long books like the three musketeers or shorter ones, but still. that’s impressive. i loved francie’s independent voice, and really felt for her as she struggled to figure out who she was and what was right for her, especially given her fierce love for her father and the battles she had with her equally strong mother. i also wanted to give a bff charm to her wonderful, loving aunt sissy, who married a bunch of different guys and was, in the parlance of the times, a “loose woman” but was the most generous and sweet character (and also sassy) in the whole book.

swoonworthy scale: 7

although the book takes a long time to get around to the swoon, starting when francie’s 11, the story of her first love is short but super poignant and swoony. i was also impressed by the openness of katie, francie’s mom, and willingness to talk about sex. y’all, this book is super old (first published in 1943, so it’s not QUITE as old as i thought, but it did take place a loooong time ago), and katie flat-out tells francie she’d always regret not sleeping with the man she fell in love with, even though they weren’t married. francie’s head-over-heels first love affair rings so true for a 17-year-old. there’s also a fair bit of swoonage between katie and johnny (francie’s dad).

talky talk: straight up

this book might be an old-fashioned classic, but betty smith doesn’t hide the truth behind lots of prose and euphemisms. she portrays the grinding poverty of williamsburg more clearly than dickens, and doesn’t romanticize the harsh conditions of tenement life. the book was scandalous when it was published because of its lack of horatio alger moral message and its unshuttered look at sex and human appetites.

bonus factor: feminism

feminism

francie is growing up before women have the right to vote, but she’s the daughter of a strong woman and has several tough female role models. in fact, the men in the story are all weak compared to the women. because francie’s poor, going to work is not a revolutionary feminist act, but by pursuing education she breaks both sex and class barriers.

bonus factor: history

herodotus

i’m a big history nerd, and historical fiction is one of my favorite genres. yep, i know this isn’t historical fiction exactly, since it’s almost a contemporary account (plus 30 years or so), but it takes place in a really fascinating period of american history — the beginning of the 20th century, when for a poor person reading a page of shakespeare and a page of the bible daily was considered getting an education, through wwI and right before prohibition (luckily, we can still have our gin legally, even if the folks during prohibition couldn’t!).

bonus factor: brooklyn

brooklyn

i’ve never been to brooklyn, unless we went there during my 8th grade class trip to nyc and i don’t remember (all i remember from that trip is getting in a HUGE fight with my bff, and spending the rest of the year communicating through our other bff — kate, tell rachel i’m not speaking to her, etc. luckily, we’re back to being bffs now). anyway, brooklyn is a huge cultural icon, from the bridge to all the annoying MFA writers who live in park slope and talk about the borough ad nauseum.

casting call

this book’s been made into two movies already, but i had a few casting ideas.

ellie kendrick as francie

ellie kendrick as francie

kate winslet as sissy

kate winslet as sissy

tyrone power as officer mcshane

tyrone power as officer mcshane

relationship status: LYLAS

love ya like a sister, tree grows in brooklyn. an older, wiser sister who could have mentored me through my own coming of age, and now like a peer as i see similar identity struggles in francie that i think all of us go through (although i in no way am comparing my whitebread middle-class life to francie’s). this one’s on my shoulda-coulda-woulda list of books i wish i’d read as a teen, although it was still delightful to read as an adult.

Share

Related posts:

  1. i am trying to break yr heart
  2. CYOA: to almost have a heart attack, turn to page 127.

{ 27 comments… read them below or add one }

Megan (no h) July 23, 2010 at 1:25 pm

Oh yay! I like the idea of you all reviewing some ‘classics’ on this site too! I haven’t read this before. I’d always had an irrational dislike toward it bc my mom loved the movie (this woman, for most my life, was utterly devoid of interests/passions and this was one of two movies she claimed to adore. Freaked me out).

But if you say the book is good, I may have to reassess!

Am I the only person who gets weird hang ups over books/movies/music just because you associate it with someone else?

Reply

samantha July 23, 2010 at 1:40 pm

I don’t know about books/movies/music but I get weird hang-ups about names. Like, my husband loves the name Connor (if/when we have kids) but I went to school w/ a Connor who was seriously, like, a nice guy & all but not the sharpest tool in the drawer, y’know? So I just can’t get my head around naming someone that.
**DISCLAIMER: Sorry if anyone here is named Connor and/or married to/dating someone with that name!!**

Reply

Sandy Katcher July 23, 2010 at 3:12 pm

Names get school teachers too! Both Brian and I had a list of names when our daughter was born that she couldn’t have. :)

Reply

Megan July 23, 2010 at 5:18 pm

oh yeah, names are SUPER weird. i don’t know what i’m going to do when i have spawn to name. there are so many good names ruined by knowing people with them. they don’t even have to be BAD people, it’s just that you still associate that name with that person.

and like, what if you’re posting your baby pics on fb and someone with the same name (if it’s not that common) is all like ‘errrm, i haven’t seen you in 10 years…why did you name your baby after me?’ and then you have to be like “I DIDN’T MAN” awkwarrrd.

Reply

Meghan July 23, 2010 at 1:44 pm

not weird at all. i have several books i refuse to read because of the people i know who love them. also several i refuse to read because of the smarmies who wrote them (see erin’s comment about williamsburg, only substitute park slope. ugh. although mo willems, i love you! and i won’t hold yr park slope address against you!).

Reply

Shyloh July 23, 2010 at 2:16 pm

I refuse to ever see Moulin Rouge because of every performance theater geek that was mean to me and my technical theater geek crew. They played that damn soundtrack SO MUCH during the set building for Les Mis that my BFF and I started bringing our own portable CD players and blasting Marilyn Manson and Coal Chamber so loud that anyone next to us was forced to hear it. Mwa ha ha.

totally irrational. I love movie musicals and hate Marilyn Manson now. Oh, 15 year old self…

Reply

Megan July 23, 2010 at 5:16 pm

Ha! The same thing happened to me with Chicago!
-Megan (no h)

Reply

samantha July 23, 2010 at 1:35 pm

I always wanted to read this one! So weird, my husband & I were just talking about it the other day and now voila! a book review. I had no idea what the story was about, so this is great.

Reply

Meghan July 23, 2010 at 1:45 pm

i’ve been meaning to read this book for about 18 years because my cousin loved it. i had no idea what it was about even when i started reading!

Reply

Erin July 23, 2010 at 1:36 pm

Remember when Williamsburg was filled with people who didn’t make me want to projectile vomit?

Excellent review, meghan! Thanks for saving my sick ass. :)

Reply

Meghan July 23, 2010 at 1:44 pm

anytime.

Reply

Poshdeluxe July 23, 2010 at 2:04 pm

there are plenty of books out there that people tell me i should’ve read by now, but most of the time i just roll my eyes cos anna karenina? i don’t think so.

but then there’s this book, which i clearly need to get my grabby hands on. it’s like newsies meets anne of green gables, i.e. FORMULA FOR SUCCESS.

thanks for adding this most excellent old school review to our archives, meghan!

Reply

Erin July 23, 2010 at 2:05 pm

NO ONE NEED EVER READ ANNA KARENINA. EVER.

Reply

Meghan July 23, 2010 at 2:13 pm

Speaking of Russians, add Doctor Zhivago to that list. God, that one took me like 3 YEARS to read, no exaggeration. I needed a whole handle of vodka when it was all over.

Reply

Erin July 23, 2010 at 2:14 pm

But I looooooooooooooove the movie so, so much.

Reply

Erin July 23, 2010 at 2:15 pm

OH MY GOD WHERE DID MY GRAVATAR GO??? GRR.

samantha July 23, 2010 at 2:19 pm

I finally read Crime & Punishment a few years ago and it was actually pretty good…but dark, man. Dark and twisted. Dostoyevsky…that’s some pretty bleak shizz.

Reply

AnimeGirl July 23, 2010 at 3:09 pm

I read Crime and punishment when I was in the seventh grade, no book a seventh-grader should be reading. But I just found Brothers Karamazov so boring and I thought Crime and Punishment would be more interesting – it’s crime and punishment – but meh.

Shyloh July 23, 2010 at 2:19 pm

The only Oprah’s book club book I have ever actually liked was While Oleander, which I highly recommend, but the rest were TERRIBLE! Who reads those books!? And why does she always pick such difficult and pretentious things? Housewives of the world, do you really read Faulkner?

Reply

samantha July 23, 2010 at 2:21 pm

Faulkner made me want to shoot myself in the head when I was in university. I don’t care how much of a “classic” it’s considered to be, Go Down Moses is BORING. Either that or I’m too dense to get it! ;)

Reply

Erin July 23, 2010 at 2:22 pm

I adore Faulkner. But hate Dickens. I realize this makes no sense.

Reply

Meghan July 23, 2010 at 2:25 pm

I love them both. Big nerd, party of one.

AnimeGirl July 23, 2010 at 3:10 pm

I’ve heard of this book but never had an idea of what it was about.
Might look it up now and try to get my grabby hands on it. :)

Reply

Jenny July 23, 2010 at 10:53 pm

Thanks for the review, Meghan! I’ve never read this one, either. It was the title that put me off. Anything that involves foliage growing somewhere was something I avoided at all cost, thanks to ‘where the red fern grows’. I missed out on this one!

Reply

LP July 23, 2010 at 11:21 pm

THANK YOU for reviewing this book! i picked it off the school library shelf when i was in 8th grade and it henceforth became my Favorite Book, officially. i’ve read it a hundred zillion times in the many years since, and i even lived in williamsburg for a while in college (not BECAUSE of the book, but it still felt pretty cramazing to be walking around streets with names that were like, mythical to me – OMG they exist in real life!).

anyway, i am infatuated with this website and have been a happy lurker for a while, but am so pleased to be commenting for the first time on this post about my Favorite Book. cheers, ladies.

Reply

Lucy Scherschligt July 25, 2010 at 12:57 pm

one of my favorite reads, i read it with two other girls for school earlier this year. i found the open sex conversations so amusing; were they really that open about their sex lives with 11 year olds in the early 1900s?

Reply

Emily December 13, 2011 at 10:06 am

I’m reading this right now and I am so in love. It’s on its way to being an all-time favorite of mine. I found this through the Required Reading tag, and I’m all for classics being on this list along with YA.

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: